clay-borg/workplans
tegwick 4fb506fcd1 CB-WP-0027 T01-T04: the commentary track
The meta view beside the table, and a note channel that provably cannot
carry a move.

T01 (ADR-0014). ADR-0007 D5 is SCOPED, NOT AMENDED, and the reason it was
easy is that PointerFact::parse already refuses any unrecognised field --
a comment could not reach the command path even by accident. So /command
carries pointer facts, /note carries text, and Note has no code path to
GroundCommand. Comments live in trials/<date>-<slug>.md, not in
ScenarioFile: a scenario is executed, replayed and hashed, and prose in it
is data the runner must ignore, which is how a format rots. The state hash
binds; round and step are for reading. And the retention question, decided
before any comment was written: RAW NOTES NEVER LEAVE clay-borg. A note
reaches ground-game only by being promoted to a register finding, by a
human, with the wording chosen then -- "the DARVO sequence is infuriating"
is useful signal and a bad way to open a message to the game's designer.

T02. CSS grid, minmax(0,1fr) on both tracks -- load-bearing, because a
grid child defaults to min-content width and without it the SVG table
refuses to shrink and pushes the meta column off-screen, looking correct
on the developer's monitor and broken everywhere else. Single-column
fallback under 64rem. The running tally moved into the panel so it is
visible WHILE PLAYING; it only appeared on the ending page before, and a
score you see once the game is over informs nothing.

T03. A plain <form method="post">, so the box works with the script
disabled; the command channel needs JavaScript because a drag is not a
form submission, a comment is one. 303 See Other so a reload does not
re-post. esc()'s first hostile input: <script>alert(1)</script> renders
escaped AND STILL READABLE -- escaping that eats the player's words is its
own defect. Verified over real HTTP: note posted 303, hostile note stored
as text, empty note refused 400, game did not advance.

T04. tools/trials.py and make trials. THE REPORT'S DESIGN CHANGED BECAUSE
I RAN IT: the first version called any note without a recording an orphan,
so a live session reported every note as broken -- the recording is only
written at game end. A metric that cries wolf is one nobody reads, which
is the exact failure this pass exists to prevent. Now ok / pending /
orphan, and only orphan is a target-0 number. The self-test exercises the
REPORTING path, not just the parser, because design-baseline.py had a
green self-test and an unexercised reporting path and that is where it
rotted.

And a latent Makefile defect surfaced: make trials did nothing, because
trials is also a directory and Make saw an up-to-date file. design,
difficulty and trials -- added by CB-WP-0022, CB-WP-0025 and this pass --
were ALL missing from .PHONY; only the one that collided revealed it.

make all: exit 0. 49 render tests, 26 cb-play, loop-lint clean.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-06 10:37:46 +02:00
..
CB-WP-0001-inner-loop.md CB-WP-0007 T01+T03: window the metric, budget it, cap meta at 25% 2026-08-01 14:12:07 +02:00
CB-WP-0002-cost-accounting.md CB-WP-0007 T01+T03: window the metric, budget it, cap meta at 25% 2026-08-01 14:12:07 +02:00
CB-WP-0003-loop-hardening.md CB-WP-0007 T01+T03: window the metric, budget it, cap meta at 25% 2026-08-01 14:12:07 +02:00
CB-WP-0004-mechanical-work.md CB-WP-0007 T01+T03: window the metric, budget it, cap meta at 25% 2026-08-01 14:12:07 +02:00
CB-WP-0005-assertion-coverage.md CB-WP-0007 T01+T03: window the metric, budget it, cap meta at 25% 2026-08-01 14:12:07 +02:00
CB-WP-0006-instrument-the-table.md CB-WP-0007 T01+T03: window the metric, budget it, cap meta at 25% 2026-08-01 14:12:07 +02:00
CB-WP-0007-session-shape.md CB-WP-0010-T01: close CB-WP-0007 2026-08-02 02:15:08 +02:00
CB-WP-0008-ship-stage-0.md CB-WP-0008-T04: CB-EV-0007 — stage 0 is shipped, and the spend curve is a V 2026-08-01 15:25:19 +02:00
CB-WP-0009-adaptive-gates.md CB-WP-0009-T04: CB-EV-0008 — the gate changes, measured 2026-08-01 15:45:08 +02:00
CB-WP-0010-consolidation.md CB-WP-0010-T03: record CommitWindow's second failed second-use 2026-08-02 02:19:23 +02:00
CB-WP-0011-inspectable-table.md CB-WP-0011-T03: evidence — the chaos roll fired, and it was right 2026-08-02 02:48:51 +02:00
CB-WP-0012-render-port.md Sync hub IDs and work-record index for CB-WP-0012 2026-08-02 04:30:45 +02:00
CB-WP-0013-instrument-corrections.md Sync hub IDs and work-record index for CB-WP-0013 2026-08-02 07:32:33 +02:00
CB-WP-0014-execute-the-javascript.md Sync hub IDs and work-record index for CB-WP-0014 2026-08-02 07:59:28 +02:00
CB-WP-0015-the-inert-clauses.md Sync hub IDs and work-record index for CB-WP-0015 2026-08-02 14:08:30 +02:00
CB-WP-0016-the-drop-target.md Sync hub IDs and work-record index for CB-WP-0016 2026-08-02 20:49:21 +02:00
CB-WP-0017-legible-interaction.md Sync hub IDs and work-record index for CB-WP-0017 2026-08-02 22:43:40 +02:00
CB-WP-0018-the-browser-is-a-client.md Sync hub IDs and work-record index for CB-WP-0018 2026-08-03 02:24:57 +02:00
CB-WP-0019-the-am4-family.md CB-WP-0019 T03/T04: the cost rule written down, and the lifecycle 2026-08-03 19:25:18 +02:00
CB-WP-0020-the-table-you-can-read.md Sync hub state for CB-WP-0020 2026-08-03 20:21:18 +02:00
CB-WP-0021-import-the-edition.md CB-WP-0021 T04: evidence -- the endings are tight, and the cost chain snapped 2026-08-05 15:56:31 +02:00
CB-WP-0022-the-design-instrument.md CB-WP-0022 T05/T06/T07: the register, and what its first run found 2026-08-05 15:22:33 +02:00
CB-WP-0023-solve-legality.md CB-EV-0020: a gate moved the rule, and the report was wrong 2026-08-04 00:21:21 +02:00
CB-WP-0024-the-table-you-can-watch.md CB-WP-0024: the table you can watch 2026-08-05 17:32:48 +02:00
CB-WP-0025-could-we-have-won.md CB-WP-0025 T06/T07: a difficulty baseline that reports its own confound 2026-08-05 19:24:49 +02:00
CB-WP-0026-collect-the-rulings.md Sync hub state for CB-WP-0026 2026-08-05 16:15:22 +02:00
CB-WP-0027-the-commentary-track.md CB-WP-0027 T01-T04: the commentary track 2026-08-06 10:37:46 +02:00