tegwick
a170458762
Some checks failed
ci / check (push) Failing after 3s
evaluate CB-EV-0027. The supply is never exceeded, and the link row explains why: GR-L01's two slots per seat ARE the twelve link tokens, the same constraint written twice. Nothing was designed to make that true; it fell out. The Focus/Blame check was wrong and I caught it -- fifth instance of the family CB-EV-0019 named (a number computed correctly about the wrong subject) and the FIRST caught before leaving the repo, rather than by an adversarial reviewer or the maintainer. That is one data point, not a trend. What differed is that this pass read its own output and asked what exactly it had compared. The family still has no control: facts-check catches copies that disagree and nothing catches a correct computation over the wrong subject. The height limit went 460 -> 500, and the evidence argues why that is a correction and not a concession. 460 was a number picked while fixing the unplayable table -- no derivation. 500 has one: ~800px viewport less ~120 header and ~150 controls leaves ~530, and the version that broke dragging declared 620. An underived limit is a measurement defect; replacing it with a derived one is CB-WP-0021 T06's rule applied rather than evaded. A later pass wanting 560 has to move the viewport budget, not the number. CHAOS WINDOW 2 IS CLOSED. Twelve declarations, zero 8s, zero overrides. Its retirement condition -- retire if an override changes nothing twice running -- was untestable from the first declaration to the last, and CB-EV-0024, 0025 and 0026 each said so; this is the fourth and final. Window 1 at d4: 12 declarations, 2 overrides, both changed the outcome. Window 2 at d8: 12, 0, none. The verdict this supports is that d8 bought rarity by spending evidence -- stronger than "the rate is too low", because the rate was chosen without asking what sample size the retirement condition needs. Recording that changes how the loop constrains its own operation, which is a tier-M trigger in its own right, so it is OUTSTANDING and named rather than bundled here. Leaving it implicit is exactly how ground-game's ten rulings went uncollected. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|---|---|---|
| .. | ||
| CB-WP-0001-inner-loop.md | ||
| CB-WP-0002-cost-accounting.md | ||
| CB-WP-0003-loop-hardening.md | ||
| CB-WP-0004-mechanical-work.md | ||
| CB-WP-0005-assertion-coverage.md | ||
| CB-WP-0006-instrument-the-table.md | ||
| CB-WP-0007-session-shape.md | ||
| CB-WP-0008-ship-stage-0.md | ||
| CB-WP-0009-adaptive-gates.md | ||
| CB-WP-0010-consolidation.md | ||
| CB-WP-0011-inspectable-table.md | ||
| CB-WP-0012-render-port.md | ||
| CB-WP-0013-instrument-corrections.md | ||
| CB-WP-0014-execute-the-javascript.md | ||
| CB-WP-0015-the-inert-clauses.md | ||
| CB-WP-0016-the-drop-target.md | ||
| CB-WP-0017-legible-interaction.md | ||
| CB-WP-0018-the-browser-is-a-client.md | ||
| CB-WP-0019-the-am4-family.md | ||
| CB-WP-0020-the-table-you-can-read.md | ||
| CB-WP-0021-import-the-edition.md | ||
| CB-WP-0022-the-design-instrument.md | ||
| CB-WP-0023-solve-legality.md | ||
| CB-WP-0024-the-table-you-can-watch.md | ||
| CB-WP-0025-could-we-have-won.md | ||
| CB-WP-0026-collect-the-rulings.md | ||
| CB-WP-0027-the-commentary-track.md | ||
| CB-WP-0028-the-table-you-sit-at.md | ||
| CB-WP-0029-the-tokens-on-the-table.md | ||