2026-07-31 00:13:55 +02:00
|
|
|
# Work Records — clay-borg
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
> Generated by `statehub fix-consistency` (CUST-WP-0061-T04, work-record
|
|
|
|
|
> stage 3). Do not edit by hand — edit the source file/block listed for
|
|
|
|
|
> each record and re-run fix-consistency to refresh this index. Archived
|
|
|
|
|
> workplans are omitted; closed decisions/intakes/engagements stay listed
|
|
|
|
|
> so recently-resolved work is still visible. [auto]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Kind | ID | Status | Lane | Source |
|
|
|
|
|
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
|
Amend CB-EV-0001; add CB-WP-0002 for cost accounting
AM-4: measured what each remediation option actually buys, rather than
leaving one recommendation unquantified. serde_yaml optional removes 6
crates, not 5 — ryu belongs to that group, since serde_json now uses
zmij for floats. Full ladder: -6 to 27, serde_json -4 more to 23,
inlining SHA-256 -8 to 19, inlining ChaCha12 -4 to 15. Only
reimplementing a primitive gets under 20, so the target is unreachable
without undoing K5/K7.
Also records that crate count compares badly across ecosystems, and
offers the alternative the count is a proxy for: 307,317 lines of
third-party source under audit against 3,398 of our own.
AM-12: corrected from "uncomputable" to measured. The refusal to
estimate was right; the claim that no instrument existed was wrong.
Session transcripts carry exact per-message usage including the cache
breakdown. This session cost $248.46 at Fable 5 rates, of which 53% is
cache reads — cost is driven by context size times turn count, not by
output volume. What is still missing is per-task attribution, since
nothing marks task boundaries in a transcript.
CB-WP-0002 makes cost measurable and attributable: survey the
instruments, decide the attribution model by ADR, spec metrics that
include cost composition rather than a bare total, build a collector
whose positive control refuses to emit unreconciled numbers, and prove
it by answering a question that could not be answered before.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-07-31 03:26:03 +02:00
|
|
|
| workplan | CB-WP-0001 | done | — | workplans/CB-WP-0001-inner-loop.md |
|
2026-07-31 08:54:33 +02:00
|
|
|
| workplan | CB-WP-0002 | done | — | workplans/CB-WP-0002-cost-accounting.md |
|
2026-07-31 09:31:53 +02:00
|
|
|
| workplan | CB-WP-0003 | done | — | workplans/CB-WP-0003-loop-hardening.md |
|
2026-07-31 10:29:17 +02:00
|
|
|
| workplan | CB-WP-0004 | done | — | workplans/CB-WP-0004-mechanical-work.md |
|
2026-07-31 18:07:30 +02:00
|
|
|
| workplan | CB-WP-0005 | done | — | workplans/CB-WP-0005-assertion-coverage.md |
|
2026-08-01 13:41:39 +02:00
|
|
|
| workplan | CB-WP-0006 | done | — | workplans/CB-WP-0006-instrument-the-table.md |
|
CB-WP-0011-T01: the inspector shows everything, and a gate says so
The renderer moves out of the play loop into inspect.rs and grows from
24 to 42 of the 43 leaf paths a populated GroundView carries. What it
had been dropping was the whole DARVO state machine, the whole GROUND
practice, the scoring mode, Focus tokens, the discard pile, per-seat
protection, and every part of the outcome except the headline.
The load-bearing half is every_view_field_is_classified, which walks
the serialized view for leaf paths and requires each to be listed as
rendered (with a token the output must contain) or omitted (with a
reason). Paths rather than keys: 'problem' occurs under a DARVO target,
a GROUND choice and a Selection, and a key-set walk would let one of
the three vouch for the other two.
Four M-D1-MUT controls, each red for its stated reason. The
unclassified-field control fired for real on the first run --
players.*.hand, a field the gate's own author had missed.
2026-08-02 02:38:38 +02:00
|
|
|
| workplan | CB-WP-0007 | done | — | workplans/CB-WP-0007-session-shape.md |
|
2026-08-01 15:35:10 +02:00
|
|
|
| workplan | CB-WP-0008 | done | — | workplans/CB-WP-0008-ship-stage-0.md |
|
2026-08-02 02:14:23 +02:00
|
|
|
| workplan | CB-WP-0009 | done | — | workplans/CB-WP-0009-adaptive-gates.md |
|
CB-WP-0011-T01: the inspector shows everything, and a gate says so
The renderer moves out of the play loop into inspect.rs and grows from
24 to 42 of the 43 leaf paths a populated GroundView carries. What it
had been dropping was the whole DARVO state machine, the whole GROUND
practice, the scoring mode, Focus tokens, the discard pile, per-seat
protection, and every part of the outcome except the headline.
The load-bearing half is every_view_field_is_classified, which walks
the serialized view for leaf paths and requires each to be listed as
rendered (with a token the output must contain) or omitted (with a
reason). Paths rather than keys: 'problem' occurs under a DARVO target,
a GROUND choice and a Selection, and a key-set walk would let one of
the three vouch for the other two.
Four M-D1-MUT controls, each red for its stated reason. The
unclassified-field control fired for real on the first run --
players.*.hand, a field the gate's own author had missed.
2026-08-02 02:38:38 +02:00
|
|
|
| workplan | CB-WP-0010 | done | — | workplans/CB-WP-0010-consolidation.md |
|
2026-08-02 02:49:19 +02:00
|
|
|
| workplan | CB-WP-0011 | done | — | workplans/CB-WP-0011-inspectable-table.md |
|
2026-08-02 04:30:45 +02:00
|
|
|
| workplan | CB-WP-0012 | done | — | workplans/CB-WP-0012-render-port.md |
|
2026-08-02 07:32:33 +02:00
|
|
|
| workplan | CB-WP-0013 | done | — | workplans/CB-WP-0013-instrument-corrections.md |
|
2026-08-02 07:59:28 +02:00
|
|
|
| workplan | CB-WP-0014 | done | — | workplans/CB-WP-0014-execute-the-javascript.md |
|
2026-08-02 14:08:30 +02:00
|
|
|
| workplan | CB-WP-0015 | done | — | workplans/CB-WP-0015-the-inert-clauses.md |
|
2026-08-02 20:49:21 +02:00
|
|
|
| workplan | CB-WP-0016 | done | — | workplans/CB-WP-0016-the-drop-target.md |
|
2026-08-02 22:43:40 +02:00
|
|
|
| workplan | CB-WP-0017 | done | — | workplans/CB-WP-0017-legible-interaction.md |
|
2026-08-03 02:24:57 +02:00
|
|
|
| workplan | CB-WP-0018 | done | — | workplans/CB-WP-0018-the-browser-is-a-client.md |
|
2026-08-03 19:27:01 +02:00
|
|
|
| workplan | CB-WP-0019 | done | — | workplans/CB-WP-0019-the-am4-family.md |
|
2026-08-03 20:21:18 +02:00
|
|
|
| workplan | CB-WP-0020 | done | — | workplans/CB-WP-0020-the-table-you-can-read.md |
|
2026-08-05 16:15:22 +02:00
|
|
|
| workplan | CB-WP-0021 | done | — | workplans/CB-WP-0021-import-the-edition.md |
|
2026-08-05 15:24:05 +02:00
|
|
|
| workplan | CB-WP-0022 | done | — | workplans/CB-WP-0022-the-design-instrument.md |
|
CB-EV-0020: a gate moved the rule, and the report was wrong
The AM-1 coverage gate failed the build on GR-P05 being uncovered, which
is what showed the rule was in the offer layer rather than in validate.
A rule enforced only by the offer is enforced only for clients that ask
what is legal. The gate did not catch a bug, it caught a design error.
And the reported case was not the one reported. CB-WP-0018, CB-EV-0016
and the message to ground-game all described SOLVE offered on a
face-down Problem; validate already rejected face-down, so it never was.
Problem 1 is the Surface Problem, face-up from the deal, so the three
inert SOLVEs were the HAND case. The ruling covers both so nothing is
invalidated, but a ruling was requested on a wrong description -- the
second time in three passes that a premise reached ground-game
unchecked, after the '12 points available' that voided GR-E01.
Two of two. The pattern is not careless analysis; it is that a claim gets
SENT the moment it is interesting and checked afterwards. Unexecuted
verification, one step further out: not a belief acted on, but a belief
published. CB-WP-0022's reproduction rule would have caught both.
An earlier mutation run reported three survivors and was wrong -- the
replacement strings did not match, so nothing was mutated. It proved
nothing and looked like a result.
Also renames CB-WP-0022-T06B to T07; the hub flagged it as an
unregistered species.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-04 00:21:21 +02:00
|
|
|
| workplan | CB-WP-0023 | done | — | workplans/CB-WP-0023-solve-legality.md |
|
2026-08-05 17:33:25 +02:00
|
|
|
| workplan | CB-WP-0024 | done | — | workplans/CB-WP-0024-the-table-you-can-watch.md |
|
2026-08-05 19:25:45 +02:00
|
|
|
| workplan | CB-WP-0025 | done | — | workplans/CB-WP-0025-could-we-have-won.md |
|
2026-08-05 16:15:22 +02:00
|
|
|
| workplan | CB-WP-0026 | done | — | workplans/CB-WP-0026-collect-the-rulings.md |
|
2026-08-06 10:39:48 +02:00
|
|
|
| workplan | CB-WP-0027 | done | — | workplans/CB-WP-0027-the-commentary-track.md |
|
2026-08-06 17:34:32 +02:00
|
|
|
| workplan | CB-WP-0028 | done | — | workplans/CB-WP-0028-the-table-you-sit-at.md |
|
2026-08-07 09:56:14 +02:00
|
|
|
| workplan | CB-WP-0029 | done | — | workplans/CB-WP-0029-the-tokens-on-the-table.md |
|
2026-08-07 13:08:56 +02:00
|
|
|
| workplan | CB-WP-0030 | done | — | workplans/CB-WP-0030-a-number-that-does-not-move.md |
|
2026-08-07 16:09:36 +02:00
|
|
|
| workplan | CB-WP-0031 | done | — | workplans/CB-WP-0031-the-comment-box-outlives-the-game.md |
|
CB-WP-0033: a game is the unit
make trials reported "positions unreachable: 4, target 0 — the recording
exists but the position moved". All four were false. A recording holds one
hash, the final state, and reachability asked whether the note's hash was
in that file — so a mid-game note could never match, and a post-game note
from any but the last game could not either. Instance 8 of the ADR-0018
family: vary only WHEN a note was written and the answer flips, with
nothing having moved.
The root cause was not the metric. play again reused state belonging to a
game: it overwrote the previous game's recording (data loss), never
cleared the journal (game 2's log opened with game 1's commands), and so a
note's command index pointed into a recording without those commands.
Fixing reachability alone would have gone green while a session still
destroyed its own evidence.
A note now binds by (game, after) — an index into the recording's own
commands list, which a reader can replay to. The hash keeps a job as the
integrity check at the end of a game, where it can actually fail. Game 1
keeps the path it was given, so GameDesign §5's documented invocation is
unchanged; later games get -2, -3 and nothing is overwritten. Legacy
5-column logs stay readable and are reported as legacy, never as orphans —
an unsubstantiated orphan claim is the defect being fixed.
All three fixes mutation-proven, including at the call site via a real
two-game session.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-07 17:41:11 +02:00
|
|
|
| workplan | CB-WP-0032 | done | — | workplans/CB-WP-0032-the-comments-in-the-account.md |
|
2026-08-07 17:49:06 +02:00
|
|
|
| workplan | CB-WP-0033 | done | — | workplans/CB-WP-0033-a-game-is-the-unit.md |
|
2026-08-07 20:31:32 +02:00
|
|
|
| workplan | CB-WP-0034 | done | — | workplans/CB-WP-0034-who-you-are-bonding-with.md |
|
specs/Ornamentation.md: what a game is besides its rules
Draws one boundary — between what the rules can see and everything else a
player experiences — and says which repository each belongs to as the
simulator grows.
"Ritual" becomes ornamentation: half the category is material rather than
ceremonial, and "decoration" is already spoken for in this repo (a control
that cannot fail). The test is not "does it have a decision in it" —
choosing who deals is a decision and is ornamental. The test is whether
the state hash moves, which reuses the instrument that already binds a
trial note to a position.
The part that earns its place in clay-borg rather than in a renderer's
stylesheet: calling something ornamentation is a CLAIM THAT IT DOES NOT
MATTER, and this project's register is a list of times that claim was
wrong — quantity in Tokens.csv, F18's four unread files, SOLVE offered
where it could not act. So a declaration carries a falsifier, and
"provisional" is a state it must say out loud.
Downstream may read, may not decide — ADR-0007 D5 restated at the
repository boundary. The port to clay-animate is deliberately NOT
designed: no consumer exists, and an interface built against an imagined
client is the same defect as a gate that cannot go red.
Five invariants, four checkable today. I3 — same seed and decisions
produce a byte-identical recording at any pace through any renderer — is
the falsifier for the whole split.
CB-WP-0036 re-declared from L to M accordingly: the animation architecture
that made it L has moved to clay-animate. No code had been written and the
tier-L review had not been run, which is the only reason it could be
re-scoped rather than unwound.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-07 21:16:34 +02:00
|
|
|
| workplan | CB-WP-0035 | done | — | workplans/CB-WP-0035-a-session-that-answers-nothing.md |
|
2026-08-07 23:12:03 +02:00
|
|
|
| workplan | CB-WP-0036 | done | — | workplans/CB-WP-0036-interactive-mode.md |
|
2026-08-08 00:50:51 +02:00
|
|
|
| workplan | CB-WP-0037 | done | — | workplans/CB-WP-0037-the-fourteen-unread-files.md |
|
|
|
|
|
| workplan | CB-WP-0038 | done | — | workplans/CB-WP-0038-h1-variant.md |
|
2026-08-08 01:09:33 +02:00
|
|
|
| workplan | CB-WP-0039 | done | — | workplans/CB-WP-0039-a-seat-that-does-not-regulate.md |
|
2026-08-08 11:44:05 +02:00
|
|
|
| workplan | CB-WP-0040 | done | — | workplans/CB-WP-0040-what-a-statement-is-about.md |
|
2026-08-08 15:35:52 +02:00
|
|
|
| workplan | CB-WP-0041 | done | — | workplans/CB-WP-0041-the-extensive-form-foundation.md |
|
2026-08-08 16:12:32 +02:00
|
|
|
| workplan | CB-WP-0042 | done | — | workplans/CB-WP-0042-h2-scoped-problem-stress.md |
|
2026-08-08 17:30:59 +02:00
|
|
|
| workplan | CB-WP-0043 | done | — | workplans/CB-WP-0043-a-problem-sits-where-its-stress-lands.md |
|
2026-08-08 17:48:19 +02:00
|
|
|
| workplan | CB-WP-0044 | done | — | workplans/CB-WP-0044-the-page-says-which-rules-it-plays.md |
|
2026-08-08 18:39:08 +02:00
|
|
|
| workplan | CB-WP-0045 | done | — | workplans/CB-WP-0045-the-table-names-what-it-shows.md |
|
2026-08-08 19:16:39 +02:00
|
|
|
| workplan | CB-WP-0046 | done | — | workplans/CB-WP-0046-the-rule-the-placement-encodes.md |
|
2026-08-08 20:52:57 +02:00
|
|
|
| workplan | CB-WP-0047 | done | — | workplans/CB-WP-0047-all-four-boards-and-all-three-modes.md |
|
2026-08-09 01:28:59 +02:00
|
|
|
| workplan | CB-WP-0048 | done | — | workplans/CB-WP-0048-a-configuration-not-a-variant.md |
|
2026-08-09 01:30:50 +02:00
|
|
|
| workplan | CB-WP-0049 | done | — | workplans/CB-WP-0049-a-seat-that-plays-its-own-objective.md |
|
2026-08-09 01:47:12 +02:00
|
|
|
| workplan | CB-WP-0050 | done | — | workplans/CB-WP-0050-every-configuration-faceted-by-aspect.md |
|
2026-07-31 00:48:22 +02:00
|
|
|
| task | CB-WP-0001-T01 | done | — | workplans/CB-WP-0001-inner-loop.md |
|
|
|
|
|
| task | CB-WP-0001-T02 | done | — | workplans/CB-WP-0001-inner-loop.md |
|
Amend CB-EV-0001; add CB-WP-0002 for cost accounting
AM-4: measured what each remediation option actually buys, rather than
leaving one recommendation unquantified. serde_yaml optional removes 6
crates, not 5 — ryu belongs to that group, since serde_json now uses
zmij for floats. Full ladder: -6 to 27, serde_json -4 more to 23,
inlining SHA-256 -8 to 19, inlining ChaCha12 -4 to 15. Only
reimplementing a primitive gets under 20, so the target is unreachable
without undoing K5/K7.
Also records that crate count compares badly across ecosystems, and
offers the alternative the count is a proxy for: 307,317 lines of
third-party source under audit against 3,398 of our own.
AM-12: corrected from "uncomputable" to measured. The refusal to
estimate was right; the claim that no instrument existed was wrong.
Session transcripts carry exact per-message usage including the cache
breakdown. This session cost $248.46 at Fable 5 rates, of which 53% is
cache reads — cost is driven by context size times turn count, not by
output volume. What is still missing is per-task attribution, since
nothing marks task boundaries in a transcript.
CB-WP-0002 makes cost measurable and attributable: survey the
instruments, decide the attribution model by ADR, spec metrics that
include cost composition rather than a bare total, build a collector
whose positive control refuses to emit unreconciled numbers, and prove
it by answering a question that could not be answered before.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-07-31 03:26:03 +02:00
|
|
|
| task | CB-WP-0001-T03 | done | — | workplans/CB-WP-0001-inner-loop.md |
|
|
|
|
|
| task | CB-WP-0001-T04 | done | — | workplans/CB-WP-0001-inner-loop.md |
|
|
|
|
|
| task | CB-WP-0001-T05 | done | — | workplans/CB-WP-0001-inner-loop.md |
|
|
|
|
|
| task | CB-WP-0001-T06 | done | — | workplans/CB-WP-0001-inner-loop.md |
|
|
|
|
|
| task | CB-WP-0001-T07 | done | — | workplans/CB-WP-0001-inner-loop.md |
|
|
|
|
|
| task | CB-WP-0001-T08 | done | — | workplans/CB-WP-0001-inner-loop.md |
|
|
|
|
|
| task | CB-WP-0001-T09 | done | — | workplans/CB-WP-0001-inner-loop.md |
|
2026-07-31 08:54:33 +02:00
|
|
|
| task | CB-WP-0002-T01 | done | — | workplans/CB-WP-0002-cost-accounting.md |
|
|
|
|
|
| task | CB-WP-0002-T02 | done | — | workplans/CB-WP-0002-cost-accounting.md |
|
|
|
|
|
| task | CB-WP-0002-T03 | done | — | workplans/CB-WP-0002-cost-accounting.md |
|
|
|
|
|
| task | CB-WP-0002-T04 | done | — | workplans/CB-WP-0002-cost-accounting.md |
|
|
|
|
|
| task | CB-WP-0002-T05 | done | — | workplans/CB-WP-0002-cost-accounting.md |
|
|
|
|
|
| task | CB-WP-0002-T06 | done | — | workplans/CB-WP-0002-cost-accounting.md |
|
|
|
|
|
| task | CB-WP-0002-T07 | done | — | workplans/CB-WP-0002-cost-accounting.md |
|
2026-07-31 09:31:53 +02:00
|
|
|
| task | CB-WP-0003-T01 | done | — | workplans/CB-WP-0003-loop-hardening.md |
|
|
|
|
|
| task | CB-WP-0003-T02 | done | — | workplans/CB-WP-0003-loop-hardening.md |
|
|
|
|
|
| task | CB-WP-0003-T03 | done | — | workplans/CB-WP-0003-loop-hardening.md |
|
|
|
|
|
| task | CB-WP-0003-T04 | done | — | workplans/CB-WP-0003-loop-hardening.md |
|
|
|
|
|
| task | CB-WP-0003-T05 | done | — | workplans/CB-WP-0003-loop-hardening.md |
|
|
|
|
|
| task | CB-WP-0003-T06 | done | — | workplans/CB-WP-0003-loop-hardening.md |
|
|
|
|
|
| task | CB-WP-0003-T07 | done | — | workplans/CB-WP-0003-loop-hardening.md |
|
|
|
|
|
| task | CB-WP-0003-T08 | done | — | workplans/CB-WP-0003-loop-hardening.md |
|
|
|
|
|
| task | CB-WP-0003-T09 | done | — | workplans/CB-WP-0003-loop-hardening.md |
|
|
|
|
|
| task | CB-WP-0003-T10 | done | — | workplans/CB-WP-0003-loop-hardening.md |
|
|
|
|
|
| task | CB-WP-0003-T11 | done | — | workplans/CB-WP-0003-loop-hardening.md |
|
2026-07-31 10:29:17 +02:00
|
|
|
| task | CB-WP-0004-T01 | done | — | workplans/CB-WP-0004-mechanical-work.md |
|
|
|
|
|
| task | CB-WP-0004-T02 | done | — | workplans/CB-WP-0004-mechanical-work.md |
|
|
|
|
|
| task | CB-WP-0004-T03 | done | — | workplans/CB-WP-0004-mechanical-work.md |
|
|
|
|
|
| task | CB-WP-0004-T04 | done | — | workplans/CB-WP-0004-mechanical-work.md |
|
|
|
|
|
| task | CB-WP-0004-T05 | done | — | workplans/CB-WP-0004-mechanical-work.md |
|
|
|
|
|
| task | CB-WP-0004-T06 | done | — | workplans/CB-WP-0004-mechanical-work.md |
|
2026-07-31 17:56:55 +02:00
|
|
|
| task | CB-WP-0005-T01 | done | — | workplans/CB-WP-0005-assertion-coverage.md |
|
|
|
|
|
| task | CB-WP-0005-T02 | done | — | workplans/CB-WP-0005-assertion-coverage.md |
|
|
|
|
|
| task | CB-WP-0005-T03 | done | — | workplans/CB-WP-0005-assertion-coverage.md |
|
|
|
|
|
| task | CB-WP-0005-T04 | cancel | — | workplans/CB-WP-0005-assertion-coverage.md |
|
|
|
|
|
| task | CB-WP-0005-T05 | cancel | — | workplans/CB-WP-0005-assertion-coverage.md |
|
|
|
|
|
| task | CB-WP-0005-T06 | cancel | — | workplans/CB-WP-0005-assertion-coverage.md |
|
2026-07-31 18:07:30 +02:00
|
|
|
| task | CB-WP-0005-T07 | done | — | workplans/CB-WP-0005-assertion-coverage.md |
|
|
|
|
|
| task | CB-WP-0005-T08 | done | — | workplans/CB-WP-0005-assertion-coverage.md |
|
2026-08-01 13:41:39 +02:00
|
|
|
| task | CB-WP-0006-T01 | done | — | workplans/CB-WP-0006-instrument-the-table.md |
|
|
|
|
|
| task | CB-WP-0006-T02 | done | — | workplans/CB-WP-0006-instrument-the-table.md |
|
|
|
|
|
| task | CB-WP-0006-T03 | done | — | workplans/CB-WP-0006-instrument-the-table.md |
|
|
|
|
|
| task | CB-WP-0006-T04 | done | — | workplans/CB-WP-0006-instrument-the-table.md |
|
|
|
|
|
| task | CB-WP-0006-T05 | done | — | workplans/CB-WP-0006-instrument-the-table.md |
|
|
|
|
|
| task | CB-WP-0006-T06 | done | — | workplans/CB-WP-0006-instrument-the-table.md |
|
|
|
|
|
| task | CB-WP-0006-T07 | done | — | workplans/CB-WP-0006-instrument-the-table.md |
|
|
|
|
|
| task | CB-WP-0006-T08 | done | — | workplans/CB-WP-0006-instrument-the-table.md |
|
|
|
|
|
| task | CB-WP-0006-T09 | done | — | workplans/CB-WP-0006-instrument-the-table.md |
|
2026-08-01 14:14:22 +02:00
|
|
|
| task | CB-WP-0007-T01 | done | — | workplans/CB-WP-0007-session-shape.md |
|
|
|
|
|
| task | CB-WP-0007-T02 | cancel | — | workplans/CB-WP-0007-session-shape.md |
|
|
|
|
|
| task | CB-WP-0007-T03 | done | — | workplans/CB-WP-0007-session-shape.md |
|
|
|
|
|
| task | CB-WP-0007-T04 | cancel | — | workplans/CB-WP-0007-session-shape.md |
|
CB-WP-0011-T01: the inspector shows everything, and a gate says so
The renderer moves out of the play loop into inspect.rs and grows from
24 to 42 of the 43 leaf paths a populated GroundView carries. What it
had been dropping was the whole DARVO state machine, the whole GROUND
practice, the scoring mode, Focus tokens, the discard pile, per-seat
protection, and every part of the outcome except the headline.
The load-bearing half is every_view_field_is_classified, which walks
the serialized view for leaf paths and requires each to be listed as
rendered (with a token the output must contain) or omitted (with a
reason). Paths rather than keys: 'problem' occurs under a DARVO target,
a GROUND choice and a Selection, and a key-set walk would let one of
the three vouch for the other two.
Four M-D1-MUT controls, each red for its stated reason. The
unclassified-field control fired for real on the first run --
players.*.hand, a field the gate's own author had missed.
2026-08-02 02:38:38 +02:00
|
|
|
| task | CB-WP-0007-T05 | cancel | — | workplans/CB-WP-0007-session-shape.md |
|
|
|
|
|
| task | CB-WP-0007-T06 | cancel | — | workplans/CB-WP-0007-session-shape.md |
|
2026-08-01 15:35:10 +02:00
|
|
|
| task | CB-WP-0008-T01 | done | — | workplans/CB-WP-0008-ship-stage-0.md |
|
|
|
|
|
| task | CB-WP-0008-T02 | done | — | workplans/CB-WP-0008-ship-stage-0.md |
|
|
|
|
|
| task | CB-WP-0008-T03 | done | — | workplans/CB-WP-0008-ship-stage-0.md |
|
|
|
|
|
| task | CB-WP-0008-T04 | done | — | workplans/CB-WP-0008-ship-stage-0.md |
|
2026-08-02 02:14:23 +02:00
|
|
|
| task | CB-WP-0009-T01 | done | — | workplans/CB-WP-0009-adaptive-gates.md |
|
|
|
|
|
| task | CB-WP-0009-T02 | done | — | workplans/CB-WP-0009-adaptive-gates.md |
|
|
|
|
|
| task | CB-WP-0009-T03 | done | — | workplans/CB-WP-0009-adaptive-gates.md |
|
|
|
|
|
| task | CB-WP-0009-T04 | done | — | workplans/CB-WP-0009-adaptive-gates.md |
|
CB-WP-0011-T01: the inspector shows everything, and a gate says so
The renderer moves out of the play loop into inspect.rs and grows from
24 to 42 of the 43 leaf paths a populated GroundView carries. What it
had been dropping was the whole DARVO state machine, the whole GROUND
practice, the scoring mode, Focus tokens, the discard pile, per-seat
protection, and every part of the outcome except the headline.
The load-bearing half is every_view_field_is_classified, which walks
the serialized view for leaf paths and requires each to be listed as
rendered (with a token the output must contain) or omitted (with a
reason). Paths rather than keys: 'problem' occurs under a DARVO target,
a GROUND choice and a Selection, and a key-set walk would let one of
the three vouch for the other two.
Four M-D1-MUT controls, each red for its stated reason. The
unclassified-field control fired for real on the first run --
players.*.hand, a field the gate's own author had missed.
2026-08-02 02:38:38 +02:00
|
|
|
| task | CB-WP-0010-T01 | done | — | workplans/CB-WP-0010-consolidation.md |
|
|
|
|
|
| task | CB-WP-0010-T02 | done | — | workplans/CB-WP-0010-consolidation.md |
|
|
|
|
|
| task | CB-WP-0010-T03 | done | — | workplans/CB-WP-0010-consolidation.md |
|
2026-08-02 02:49:19 +02:00
|
|
|
| task | CB-WP-0011-T01 | done | — | workplans/CB-WP-0011-inspectable-table.md |
|
|
|
|
|
| task | CB-WP-0011-T02 | done | — | workplans/CB-WP-0011-inspectable-table.md |
|
|
|
|
|
| task | CB-WP-0011-T03 | done | — | workplans/CB-WP-0011-inspectable-table.md |
|
CB-WP-0012-T05: evidence — tier L deleted its own deliverable
CB-EV-0010. The pass's own verdict on the tier it ran at.
Full-weight review withdrew the capability port the declaration was made
to build. A tier-S pass has no step 2 and would have shipped it, and
stage 2 would have found it unimplementable — which is what CommitWindow
is already on record in this repo for doing.
Two corrections of the survey's own numbers, compounding:
AM-4a headroom 3,750 claimed -> 92,798 measured (25x)
cheapest windowed 480,501 claimed -> 140,079 measured (3.4x)
headline ratio 128x -> 1.5x (85x)
The prediction from CB-EV-0009 §4 held: meta budget reads 0%, published
in advance and unfalsified.
A correction that is now a pattern: CB-EV-0009 reported CB-WP-0011 at
45 responses / $4.23 / 0.094; final is 71 / $7.02 / 0.099. Still the
cheapest pass, so the conclusion stands. But that is the second
consecutive evidence file to report its own pass's cost low — a pass
cannot measure its own cost, and one quoting its own is quoting a floor.
First priced tier comparison on a single subject: 0.123 $/response at L
against 0.099 at S — 24% more, for a pass that found the two errors
above. On one data point, step 2 is cheap.
Not shipped, and said plainly: the emitted JavaScript has never been
executed. The socket loop is tested end to end with synthetic HTTP and
the page is asserted against as a parsed document, but no browser engine
has run it. INTENT stage 1 therefore stays open even though all four of
its named deliverables now exist.
SH-3 reads 0.0% for a sixth consecutive pass and remains the oldest
unargued number in the project.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-02 04:30:10 +02:00
|
|
|
| task | CB-WP-0012-T01 | done | — | workplans/CB-WP-0012-render-port.md |
|
|
|
|
|
| task | CB-WP-0012-T02 | done | — | workplans/CB-WP-0012-render-port.md |
|
|
|
|
|
| task | CB-WP-0012-T03 | done | — | workplans/CB-WP-0012-render-port.md |
|
|
|
|
|
| task | CB-WP-0012-T04 | done | — | workplans/CB-WP-0012-render-port.md |
|
|
|
|
|
| task | CB-WP-0012-T05 | done | — | workplans/CB-WP-0012-render-port.md |
|
2026-08-02 07:32:07 +02:00
|
|
|
| task | CB-WP-0013-T01 | done | — | workplans/CB-WP-0013-instrument-corrections.md |
|
|
|
|
|
| task | CB-WP-0013-T02 | done | — | workplans/CB-WP-0013-instrument-corrections.md |
|
|
|
|
|
| task | CB-WP-0013-T03 | done | — | workplans/CB-WP-0013-instrument-corrections.md |
|
|
|
|
|
| task | CB-WP-0013-T04 | done | — | workplans/CB-WP-0013-instrument-corrections.md |
|
CB-WP-0014-T03: hot-seat evidenced; stage 1 open on one human check
CB-EV-0012. Stage 1, deliverable by deliverable:
relationship-graph visualization emitted and gated, NEVER SEEN
drag-to-propose evidenced end to end
debug inspector evidenced (CB-WP-0011)
hot-seat play evidenced here
Hot-seat was the one closest to being claimed on the strength of the code
path existing. SeatPolicy hands every human seat a handle on one shared
Server, so turn-taking "obviously" worked — and nothing drove more than
one seat until now. The property that matters is not that two turns
happen but that the same tab, asked twice, shows two different hands.
Mutating the projection to serve P1's view to every seat turns it red.
The stage stays open on ONE named blocker rather than a vague
reservation: no browser is available to this loop, so the visualization
is evidenced only as correctly emitted. Everything testable from here has
been tested. What remains is `cb-play --serve 0`, open the URL, confirm
the table reads and a drag works. INTENT carries that note now.
The self-quoting rule from CB-EV-0011 §4 is ADOPTED: an evidence file
quotes the previous pass's final cost and never its own. CB-WP-0013
reported itself at $5.78/34 mid-flight; final is $8.26/47, under by 43%.
Four for four, always low.
Meta budget 29% [OVER] soft 25%, driven by CB-WP-0013 in a trailing three
with two cheap product passes; it was an instrument repair, which
ADR-0006 D2 exempts.
SH-1 at 347,720 [HARD] against a 300,000 ceiling. Compaction is the
remedy and this session cannot do it for itself. CB-EV-0009's standing
prediction is now live and testable for the first time in three passes.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-02 07:58:59 +02:00
|
|
|
| task | CB-WP-0014-T01 | done | — | workplans/CB-WP-0014-execute-the-javascript.md |
|
|
|
|
|
| task | CB-WP-0014-T02 | done | — | workplans/CB-WP-0014-execute-the-javascript.md |
|
|
|
|
|
| task | CB-WP-0014-T03 | done | — | workplans/CB-WP-0014-execute-the-javascript.md |
|
2026-08-02 14:08:30 +02:00
|
|
|
| task | CB-WP-0015-T01 | done | — | workplans/CB-WP-0015-the-inert-clauses.md |
|
|
|
|
|
| task | CB-WP-0015-T02 | done | — | workplans/CB-WP-0015-the-inert-clauses.md |
|
|
|
|
|
| task | CB-WP-0015-T03 | done | — | workplans/CB-WP-0015-the-inert-clauses.md |
|
2026-08-02 20:49:21 +02:00
|
|
|
| task | CB-WP-0016-T01 | done | — | workplans/CB-WP-0016-the-drop-target.md |
|
|
|
|
|
| task | CB-WP-0016-T02 | done | — | workplans/CB-WP-0016-the-drop-target.md |
|
|
|
|
|
| task | CB-WP-0016-T03 | done | — | workplans/CB-WP-0016-the-drop-target.md |
|
2026-08-02 22:43:40 +02:00
|
|
|
| task | CB-WP-0017-T01 | done | — | workplans/CB-WP-0017-legible-interaction.md |
|
|
|
|
|
| task | CB-WP-0017-T02 | done | — | workplans/CB-WP-0017-legible-interaction.md |
|
|
|
|
|
| task | CB-WP-0017-T03 | done | — | workplans/CB-WP-0017-legible-interaction.md |
|
|
|
|
|
| task | CB-WP-0017-T04 | done | — | workplans/CB-WP-0017-legible-interaction.md |
|
2026-08-03 02:24:57 +02:00
|
|
|
| task | CB-WP-0018-T01 | done | — | workplans/CB-WP-0018-the-browser-is-a-client.md |
|
|
|
|
|
| task | CB-WP-0018-T02 | done | — | workplans/CB-WP-0018-the-browser-is-a-client.md |
|
|
|
|
|
| task | CB-WP-0018-T03 | done | — | workplans/CB-WP-0018-the-browser-is-a-client.md |
|
|
|
|
|
| task | CB-WP-0018-T04 | done | — | workplans/CB-WP-0018-the-browser-is-a-client.md |
|
2026-08-03 19:27:01 +02:00
|
|
|
| task | CB-WP-0019-T01 | done | — | workplans/CB-WP-0019-the-am4-family.md |
|
|
|
|
|
| task | CB-WP-0019-T02 | done | — | workplans/CB-WP-0019-the-am4-family.md |
|
|
|
|
|
| task | CB-WP-0019-T03 | done | — | workplans/CB-WP-0019-the-am4-family.md |
|
|
|
|
|
| task | CB-WP-0019-T04 | done | — | workplans/CB-WP-0019-the-am4-family.md |
|
2026-08-03 18:58:04 +02:00
|
|
|
| task | CB-WP-0019-T05 | done | — | workplans/CB-WP-0019-the-am4-family.md |
|
2026-08-03 20:21:18 +02:00
|
|
|
| task | CB-WP-0020-T01 | done | — | workplans/CB-WP-0020-the-table-you-can-read.md |
|
|
|
|
|
| task | CB-WP-0020-T02 | done | — | workplans/CB-WP-0020-the-table-you-can-read.md |
|
|
|
|
|
| task | CB-WP-0020-T03 | done | — | workplans/CB-WP-0020-the-table-you-can-read.md |
|
|
|
|
|
| task | CB-WP-0020-T04 | done | — | workplans/CB-WP-0020-the-table-you-can-read.md |
|
|
|
|
|
| task | CB-WP-0020-T05 | done | — | workplans/CB-WP-0020-the-table-you-can-read.md |
|
|
|
|
|
| task | CB-WP-0020-T06 | done | — | workplans/CB-WP-0020-the-table-you-can-read.md |
|
2026-08-04 01:11:30 +02:00
|
|
|
| task | CB-WP-0021-T01 | done | — | workplans/CB-WP-0021-import-the-edition.md |
|
|
|
|
|
| task | CB-WP-0021-T02 | done | — | workplans/CB-WP-0021-import-the-edition.md |
|
|
|
|
|
| task | CB-WP-0021-T03 | done | — | workplans/CB-WP-0021-import-the-edition.md |
|
2026-08-05 16:15:22 +02:00
|
|
|
| task | CB-WP-0021-T04 | done | — | workplans/CB-WP-0021-import-the-edition.md |
|
2026-08-04 01:11:30 +02:00
|
|
|
| task | CB-WP-0021-T05 | done | — | workplans/CB-WP-0021-import-the-edition.md |
|
|
|
|
|
| task | CB-WP-0021-T06 | done | — | workplans/CB-WP-0021-import-the-edition.md |
|
CB-EV-0020: a gate moved the rule, and the report was wrong
The AM-1 coverage gate failed the build on GR-P05 being uncovered, which
is what showed the rule was in the offer layer rather than in validate.
A rule enforced only by the offer is enforced only for clients that ask
what is legal. The gate did not catch a bug, it caught a design error.
And the reported case was not the one reported. CB-WP-0018, CB-EV-0016
and the message to ground-game all described SOLVE offered on a
face-down Problem; validate already rejected face-down, so it never was.
Problem 1 is the Surface Problem, face-up from the deal, so the three
inert SOLVEs were the HAND case. The ruling covers both so nothing is
invalidated, but a ruling was requested on a wrong description -- the
second time in three passes that a premise reached ground-game
unchecked, after the '12 points available' that voided GR-E01.
Two of two. The pattern is not careless analysis; it is that a claim gets
SENT the moment it is interesting and checked afterwards. Unexecuted
verification, one step further out: not a belief acted on, but a belief
published. CB-WP-0022's reproduction rule would have caught both.
An earlier mutation run reported three survivors and was wrong -- the
replacement strings did not match, so nothing was mutated. It proved
nothing and looked like a result.
Also renames CB-WP-0022-T06B to T07; the hub flagged it as an
unregistered species.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-04 00:21:21 +02:00
|
|
|
| task | CB-WP-0022-T01 | done | — | workplans/CB-WP-0022-the-design-instrument.md |
|
2026-08-05 15:24:05 +02:00
|
|
|
| task | CB-WP-0022-T02 | done | — | workplans/CB-WP-0022-the-design-instrument.md |
|
|
|
|
|
| task | CB-WP-0022-T03 | done | — | workplans/CB-WP-0022-the-design-instrument.md |
|
|
|
|
|
| task | CB-WP-0022-T04 | done | — | workplans/CB-WP-0022-the-design-instrument.md |
|
|
|
|
|
| task | CB-WP-0022-T05 | done | — | workplans/CB-WP-0022-the-design-instrument.md |
|
|
|
|
|
| task | CB-WP-0022-T06 | done | — | workplans/CB-WP-0022-the-design-instrument.md |
|
|
|
|
|
| task | CB-WP-0022-T07 | done | — | workplans/CB-WP-0022-the-design-instrument.md |
|
CB-EV-0020: a gate moved the rule, and the report was wrong
The AM-1 coverage gate failed the build on GR-P05 being uncovered, which
is what showed the rule was in the offer layer rather than in validate.
A rule enforced only by the offer is enforced only for clients that ask
what is legal. The gate did not catch a bug, it caught a design error.
And the reported case was not the one reported. CB-WP-0018, CB-EV-0016
and the message to ground-game all described SOLVE offered on a
face-down Problem; validate already rejected face-down, so it never was.
Problem 1 is the Surface Problem, face-up from the deal, so the three
inert SOLVEs were the HAND case. The ruling covers both so nothing is
invalidated, but a ruling was requested on a wrong description -- the
second time in three passes that a premise reached ground-game
unchecked, after the '12 points available' that voided GR-E01.
Two of two. The pattern is not careless analysis; it is that a claim gets
SENT the moment it is interesting and checked afterwards. Unexecuted
verification, one step further out: not a belief acted on, but a belief
published. CB-WP-0022's reproduction rule would have caught both.
An earlier mutation run reported three survivors and was wrong -- the
replacement strings did not match, so nothing was mutated. It proved
nothing and looked like a result.
Also renames CB-WP-0022-T06B to T07; the hub flagged it as an
unregistered species.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-04 00:21:21 +02:00
|
|
|
| task | CB-WP-0023-T01 | done | — | workplans/CB-WP-0023-solve-legality.md |
|
|
|
|
|
| task | CB-WP-0023-T02 | done | — | workplans/CB-WP-0023-solve-legality.md |
|
|
|
|
|
| task | CB-WP-0023-T03 | done | — | workplans/CB-WP-0023-solve-legality.md |
|
2026-08-05 17:33:25 +02:00
|
|
|
| task | CB-WP-0024-T01 | done | — | workplans/CB-WP-0024-the-table-you-can-watch.md |
|
|
|
|
|
| task | CB-WP-0024-T02 | done | — | workplans/CB-WP-0024-the-table-you-can-watch.md |
|
|
|
|
|
| task | CB-WP-0024-T03 | done | — | workplans/CB-WP-0024-the-table-you-can-watch.md |
|
|
|
|
|
| task | CB-WP-0024-T04 | done | — | workplans/CB-WP-0024-the-table-you-can-watch.md |
|
|
|
|
|
| task | CB-WP-0024-T05 | done | — | workplans/CB-WP-0024-the-table-you-can-watch.md |
|
2026-08-05 18:06:35 +02:00
|
|
|
| task | CB-WP-0025-T01 | done | — | workplans/CB-WP-0025-could-we-have-won.md |
|
|
|
|
|
| task | CB-WP-0025-T02 | done | — | workplans/CB-WP-0025-could-we-have-won.md |
|
2026-08-05 19:25:45 +02:00
|
|
|
| task | CB-WP-0025-T03 | done | — | workplans/CB-WP-0025-could-we-have-won.md |
|
|
|
|
|
| task | CB-WP-0025-T04 | done | — | workplans/CB-WP-0025-could-we-have-won.md |
|
|
|
|
|
| task | CB-WP-0025-T05 | done | — | workplans/CB-WP-0025-could-we-have-won.md |
|
|
|
|
|
| task | CB-WP-0025-T06 | done | — | workplans/CB-WP-0025-could-we-have-won.md |
|
|
|
|
|
| task | CB-WP-0025-T07 | done | — | workplans/CB-WP-0025-could-we-have-won.md |
|
2026-08-05 16:15:22 +02:00
|
|
|
| task | CB-WP-0026-T01 | done | — | workplans/CB-WP-0026-collect-the-rulings.md |
|
|
|
|
|
| task | CB-WP-0026-T02 | done | — | workplans/CB-WP-0026-collect-the-rulings.md |
|
|
|
|
|
| task | CB-WP-0026-T03 | done | — | workplans/CB-WP-0026-collect-the-rulings.md |
|
|
|
|
|
| task | CB-WP-0026-T04 | done | — | workplans/CB-WP-0026-collect-the-rulings.md |
|
|
|
|
|
| task | CB-WP-0026-T05 | done | — | workplans/CB-WP-0026-collect-the-rulings.md |
|
2026-08-06 10:39:48 +02:00
|
|
|
| task | CB-WP-0027-T01 | done | — | workplans/CB-WP-0027-the-commentary-track.md |
|
|
|
|
|
| task | CB-WP-0027-T02 | done | — | workplans/CB-WP-0027-the-commentary-track.md |
|
|
|
|
|
| task | CB-WP-0027-T03 | done | — | workplans/CB-WP-0027-the-commentary-track.md |
|
|
|
|
|
| task | CB-WP-0027-T04 | done | — | workplans/CB-WP-0027-the-commentary-track.md |
|
|
|
|
|
| task | CB-WP-0027-T05 | done | — | workplans/CB-WP-0027-the-commentary-track.md |
|
2026-08-06 17:34:32 +02:00
|
|
|
| task | CB-WP-0028-T01 | done | — | workplans/CB-WP-0028-the-table-you-sit-at.md |
|
|
|
|
|
| task | CB-WP-0028-T02 | done | — | workplans/CB-WP-0028-the-table-you-sit-at.md |
|
|
|
|
|
| task | CB-WP-0028-T03 | done | — | workplans/CB-WP-0028-the-table-you-sit-at.md |
|
|
|
|
|
| task | CB-WP-0028-T04 | done | — | workplans/CB-WP-0028-the-table-you-sit-at.md |
|
|
|
|
|
| task | CB-WP-0028-T05 | done | — | workplans/CB-WP-0028-the-table-you-sit-at.md |
|
|
|
|
|
| task | CB-WP-0028-T06 | done | — | workplans/CB-WP-0028-the-table-you-sit-at.md |
|
|
|
|
|
| task | CB-WP-0028-T07 | done | — | workplans/CB-WP-0028-the-table-you-sit-at.md |
|
|
|
|
|
| task | CB-WP-0028-T08 | done | — | workplans/CB-WP-0028-the-table-you-sit-at.md |
|
2026-08-07 09:56:14 +02:00
|
|
|
| task | CB-WP-0029-T01 | done | — | workplans/CB-WP-0029-the-tokens-on-the-table.md |
|
|
|
|
|
| task | CB-WP-0029-T02 | done | — | workplans/CB-WP-0029-the-tokens-on-the-table.md |
|
|
|
|
|
| task | CB-WP-0029-T03 | done | — | workplans/CB-WP-0029-the-tokens-on-the-table.md |
|
|
|
|
|
| task | CB-WP-0029-T04 | done | — | workplans/CB-WP-0029-the-tokens-on-the-table.md |
|
2026-08-07 13:08:56 +02:00
|
|
|
| task | CB-WP-0030-T01 | done | — | workplans/CB-WP-0030-a-number-that-does-not-move.md |
|
|
|
|
|
| task | CB-WP-0030-T02 | done | — | workplans/CB-WP-0030-a-number-that-does-not-move.md |
|
|
|
|
|
| task | CB-WP-0030-T03 | done | — | workplans/CB-WP-0030-a-number-that-does-not-move.md |
|
|
|
|
|
| task | CB-WP-0030-T04 | done | — | workplans/CB-WP-0030-a-number-that-does-not-move.md |
|
2026-08-07 16:09:36 +02:00
|
|
|
| task | CB-WP-0031-T01 | done | — | workplans/CB-WP-0031-the-comment-box-outlives-the-game.md |
|
CB-WP-0033: a game is the unit
make trials reported "positions unreachable: 4, target 0 — the recording
exists but the position moved". All four were false. A recording holds one
hash, the final state, and reachability asked whether the note's hash was
in that file — so a mid-game note could never match, and a post-game note
from any but the last game could not either. Instance 8 of the ADR-0018
family: vary only WHEN a note was written and the answer flips, with
nothing having moved.
The root cause was not the metric. play again reused state belonging to a
game: it overwrote the previous game's recording (data loss), never
cleared the journal (game 2's log opened with game 1's commands), and so a
note's command index pointed into a recording without those commands.
Fixing reachability alone would have gone green while a session still
destroyed its own evidence.
A note now binds by (game, after) — an index into the recording's own
commands list, which a reader can replay to. The hash keeps a job as the
integrity check at the end of a game, where it can actually fail. Game 1
keeps the path it was given, so GameDesign §5's documented invocation is
unchanged; later games get -2, -3 and nothing is overwritten. Legacy
5-column logs stay readable and are reported as legacy, never as orphans —
an unsubstantiated orphan claim is the defect being fixed.
All three fixes mutation-proven, including at the call site via a real
two-game session.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-07 17:41:11 +02:00
|
|
|
| task | CB-WP-0032-T01 | done | — | workplans/CB-WP-0032-the-comments-in-the-account.md |
|
2026-08-07 17:49:06 +02:00
|
|
|
| task | CB-WP-0033-T01 | done | — | workplans/CB-WP-0033-a-game-is-the-unit.md |
|
2026-08-07 20:31:32 +02:00
|
|
|
| task | CB-WP-0034-T01 | done | — | workplans/CB-WP-0034-who-you-are-bonding-with.md |
|
specs/Ornamentation.md: what a game is besides its rules
Draws one boundary — between what the rules can see and everything else a
player experiences — and says which repository each belongs to as the
simulator grows.
"Ritual" becomes ornamentation: half the category is material rather than
ceremonial, and "decoration" is already spoken for in this repo (a control
that cannot fail). The test is not "does it have a decision in it" —
choosing who deals is a decision and is ornamental. The test is whether
the state hash moves, which reuses the instrument that already binds a
trial note to a position.
The part that earns its place in clay-borg rather than in a renderer's
stylesheet: calling something ornamentation is a CLAIM THAT IT DOES NOT
MATTER, and this project's register is a list of times that claim was
wrong — quantity in Tokens.csv, F18's four unread files, SOLVE offered
where it could not act. So a declaration carries a falsifier, and
"provisional" is a state it must say out loud.
Downstream may read, may not decide — ADR-0007 D5 restated at the
repository boundary. The port to clay-animate is deliberately NOT
designed: no consumer exists, and an interface built against an imagined
client is the same defect as a gate that cannot go red.
Five invariants, four checkable today. I3 — same seed and decisions
produce a byte-identical recording at any pace through any renderer — is
the falsifier for the whole split.
CB-WP-0036 re-declared from L to M accordingly: the animation architecture
that made it L has moved to clay-animate. No code had been written and the
tier-L review had not been run, which is the only reason it could be
re-scoped rather than unwound.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-07 21:16:34 +02:00
|
|
|
| task | CB-WP-0035-T01 | done | — | workplans/CB-WP-0035-a-session-that-answers-nothing.md |
|
2026-08-07 21:17:22 +02:00
|
|
|
| task | CB-WP-0036-T01 | done | — | workplans/CB-WP-0036-interactive-mode.md |
|
2026-08-07 23:12:03 +02:00
|
|
|
| task | CB-WP-0036-T02 | done | — | workplans/CB-WP-0036-interactive-mode.md |
|
|
|
|
|
| task | CB-WP-0036-T03 | done | — | workplans/CB-WP-0036-interactive-mode.md |
|
|
|
|
|
| task | CB-WP-0037-T01 | done | — | workplans/CB-WP-0037-the-fourteen-unread-files.md |
|
2026-08-08 00:33:24 +02:00
|
|
|
| task | CB-WP-0037-T02 | done | — | workplans/CB-WP-0037-the-fourteen-unread-files.md |
|
2026-08-08 00:50:51 +02:00
|
|
|
| task | CB-WP-0037-T03 | done | — | workplans/CB-WP-0037-the-fourteen-unread-files.md |
|
|
|
|
|
| task | CB-WP-0037-T04 | done | — | workplans/CB-WP-0037-the-fourteen-unread-files.md |
|
|
|
|
|
| task | CB-WP-0038-T01 | done | — | workplans/CB-WP-0038-h1-variant.md |
|
|
|
|
|
| task | CB-WP-0038-T02 | done | — | workplans/CB-WP-0038-h1-variant.md |
|
|
|
|
|
| task | CB-WP-0038-T03 | done | — | workplans/CB-WP-0038-h1-variant.md |
|
2026-08-08 01:09:33 +02:00
|
|
|
| task | CB-WP-0039-T01 | done | — | workplans/CB-WP-0039-a-seat-that-does-not-regulate.md |
|
2026-08-08 11:44:05 +02:00
|
|
|
| task | CB-WP-0040-T01 | done | — | workplans/CB-WP-0040-what-a-statement-is-about.md |
|
|
|
|
|
| task | CB-WP-0040-T02 | done | — | workplans/CB-WP-0040-what-a-statement-is-about.md |
|
2026-08-08 11:57:24 +02:00
|
|
|
| task | CB-WP-0040-T03 | done | — | workplans/CB-WP-0040-what-a-statement-is-about.md |
|
2026-08-08 15:19:43 +02:00
|
|
|
| task | CB-WP-0041-T01 | done | — | workplans/CB-WP-0041-the-extensive-form-foundation.md |
|
2026-08-08 15:35:52 +02:00
|
|
|
| task | CB-WP-0041-T02 | done | — | workplans/CB-WP-0041-the-extensive-form-foundation.md |
|
|
|
|
|
| task | CB-WP-0041-T03 | done | — | workplans/CB-WP-0041-the-extensive-form-foundation.md |
|
|
|
|
|
| task | CB-WP-0041-T04 | done | — | workplans/CB-WP-0041-the-extensive-form-foundation.md |
|
2026-08-08 16:12:32 +02:00
|
|
|
| task | CB-WP-0042-T01 | done | — | workplans/CB-WP-0042-h2-scoped-problem-stress.md |
|
|
|
|
|
| task | CB-WP-0042-T02 | done | — | workplans/CB-WP-0042-h2-scoped-problem-stress.md |
|
|
|
|
|
| task | CB-WP-0042-T03 | done | — | workplans/CB-WP-0042-h2-scoped-problem-stress.md |
|
|
|
|
|
| task | CB-WP-0042-T04 | done | — | workplans/CB-WP-0042-h2-scoped-problem-stress.md |
|
|
|
|
|
| task | CB-WP-0042-T05 | done | — | workplans/CB-WP-0042-h2-scoped-problem-stress.md |
|
2026-08-08 17:30:59 +02:00
|
|
|
| task | CB-WP-0043-T01 | done | — | workplans/CB-WP-0043-a-problem-sits-where-its-stress-lands.md |
|
2026-08-08 17:48:19 +02:00
|
|
|
| task | CB-WP-0044-T01 | done | — | workplans/CB-WP-0044-the-page-says-which-rules-it-plays.md |
|
2026-08-08 18:39:08 +02:00
|
|
|
| task | CB-WP-0045-T01 | done | — | workplans/CB-WP-0045-the-table-names-what-it-shows.md |
|
2026-08-08 19:16:39 +02:00
|
|
|
| task | CB-WP-0046-T01 | done | — | workplans/CB-WP-0046-the-rule-the-placement-encodes.md |
|
2026-08-08 20:52:57 +02:00
|
|
|
| task | CB-WP-0047-T01 | done | — | workplans/CB-WP-0047-all-four-boards-and-all-three-modes.md |
|
2026-08-08 22:10:43 +02:00
|
|
|
| task | CB-WP-0048-T00 | done | — | workplans/CB-WP-0048-a-configuration-not-a-variant.md |
|
2026-08-08 22:47:45 +02:00
|
|
|
| task | CB-WP-0048-T01 | done | — | workplans/CB-WP-0048-a-configuration-not-a-variant.md |
|
2026-08-09 00:55:41 +02:00
|
|
|
| task | CB-WP-0048-T02 | done | — | workplans/CB-WP-0048-a-configuration-not-a-variant.md |
|
|
|
|
|
| task | CB-WP-0048-T03 | done | — | workplans/CB-WP-0048-a-configuration-not-a-variant.md |
|
|
|
|
|
| task | CB-WP-0048-T04 | done | — | workplans/CB-WP-0048-a-configuration-not-a-variant.md |
|
2026-08-08 22:47:45 +02:00
|
|
|
| task | CB-WP-0049-T01 | done | — | workplans/CB-WP-0049-a-seat-that-plays-its-own-objective.md |
|
2026-08-08 23:32:35 +02:00
|
|
|
| task | CB-WP-0049-T02 | done | — | workplans/CB-WP-0049-a-seat-that-plays-its-own-objective.md |
|
|
|
|
|
| task | CB-WP-0049-T03 | done | — | workplans/CB-WP-0049-a-seat-that-plays-its-own-objective.md |
|
2026-08-09 01:28:59 +02:00
|
|
|
| task | CB-WP-0049-T04 | done | — | workplans/CB-WP-0049-a-seat-that-plays-its-own-objective.md |
|
2026-08-09 01:47:12 +02:00
|
|
|
| task | CB-WP-0050-T01 | done | — | workplans/CB-WP-0050-every-configuration-faceted-by-aspect.md |
|
2026-08-09 02:31:45 +02:00
|
|
|
| task | CB-WP-0050-T02 | done | — | workplans/CB-WP-0050-every-configuration-faceted-by-aspect.md |
|