Closes the local protocol surface of gap G01 from the scope assessment
(KEY-WP-0016). The browser grant validated PKCE, client id and scopes but left
four bindings unenforced, and UserInfo verified less than the caller CLI does.
Authorization-code path: bind the exchange to the redirect URI the code was
issued for, refuse clients whose registration does not permit the grant, and
authenticate confidential clients with a digest-based constant-time comparison
over the same credential sources as the service grant. An empty grantTypes stays
an implicit authorization-code client, matching config validation.
Code consumption: SessionStore.Consume reads and deletes under one lock. The
previous Get/Delete pair spanned JWT signing, and the added test reproduces the
race against that version -- 9 of 16 concurrent exchanges succeeded, and a
failed exchange left the code replayable.
UserInfo: check the JOSE header algorithm before trusting the signature, require
the configured issuer, and require an access token rather than accepting an ID
token of the right shape. Purpose is decided on the scope claim so the issued
token contract, which consumers pin exactly, does not change.
SCOPE.md and the assessment record which bindings are now enforced and that the
Authelia upstream-trust assumption remains open, so G01 is not fully closed and
no profile-conformance claim is made.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01NV9oijZukGyGbRQGGKnK4P
Assistant: claude-code
Assistant-Model: opus
Assistant-Process: 713576@bnt-lap001
Assistant-Session: 384c511d-9bce-4cb8-a676-2aef6c0c8df6
Operator decision 5ed3fb35-eca9-413a-82b9-95171ba85bf6 accepts tenant:platform
as the platform management tenant for the Glas approval chain, requiring exact
spelling across the approval store, the service-client JWT claim and the
lifecycle CheckRequest.
Changes the tenant field on secrets-engine-approval and approval-engine-operator
only, in the registration fixture and the provisioning packet. Unrelated clients
and the human directory default keep tenant:coulomb, and no audience, scope,
subject, role, lifetime or MFA grant changes.
Adds issuance evidence that the approval shape emits tenant:platform exactly and
never an alias the caller requests, that the OpenBao client gains no
cross-tenant reach, and a fixture guard pinning every reviewed client's tenant.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01NV9oijZukGyGbRQGGKnK4P
Assistant: claude-code
Assistant-Model: opus
Assistant-Process: 713576@bnt-lap001
Assistant-Session: 384c511d-9bce-4cb8-a676-2aef6c0c8df6
Answers the GLAS-WP-0015 tenant-alignment request. The JWT tenant is
tenant:coulomb for all four reviewed service registrations; the approval store
tenant and the policy tenant belong to other owners and KeyCape does no
normalization between them. No mapping is invented and no live registration
changes.
Adds regression tests proving the tenant claim is bound at registration and is
not influenced by request parameters, that distinct registrations never carry
each other's tenant, and that human tokens fall back to the platform tenant
rather than an empty claim.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01NV9oijZukGyGbRQGGKnK4P
Assistant: claude-code
Assistant-Model: opus
Assistant-Process: 713576@bnt-lap001
Assistant-Session: 384c511d-9bce-4cb8-a676-2aef6c0c8df6
These workplans exist only in the retired local hub. Their random pre-ADR-007
identifiers are refused by C-06 as stale references, so they cannot be
registered. Deriving from the canonical record id takes no identity from
anything: central does not hold them and the old ids die with the cache.
Records central already holds were deliberately left untouched.
Refs CUST-WP-0068-T06
Assistant: claude-code
Assistant-Model: opus
Assistant-Process: 2583210@bnt-lap001
Assistant-Session: f2bff2d5-e9b2-4338-92ca-10282a927006
Add signed registration/enrollment handoffs, per-request assurance
policy with login-session isolation, and /logout. coulomb-social
stays AAL1 unless acr_values or another client raises the bar.
Allow coulomb-social ordinary login at AAL1 via mfaRequired: false while
keeping provider requireForAll for clients without an override. Preserve
explicit acr_values=aal2 for step-up.
New internal/adapters/tenantengine package, mirroring
internal/adapters/{lldap,privacyidea,authelia}'s shape: Client.Roles()
calls tenant-engine's cache-read endpoint. Fails open by construction --
unreachable, non-200, malformed body, or a nil *Client all return
(nil, false), never an error to specially handle. Wired into
TokenHandler.TenantEngine (nil by default, existing tests unaffected);
token.go stamps tenant_roles only when ok.
7 adapter tests plus 3 TokenHandler-level tests proving the actual
required behavior end-to-end: present when reachable, token issuance still
200 with every other core claim intact when unreachable (tenant_roles
simply absent -- the literal done-criteria), absent when not configured.
Real bug found and fixed at the source, not worked around: the first live
cross-process check (real flex-auth, real tenant-engine, this adapter)
returned tenant_not_found for a tenant that existed -- tenant-engine's read
endpoint was keyed by its internal tenant_id, but key-cape only ever has
the tenant's profile identifier. Fixed in tenant-engine
(ADHOC-2026-07-24), re-verified with the same live three-process chain --
roles=[IAM] ok=true.
Workplan closed: T01-T03 done. Explicitly still open: client_credentials /
service-token issuance -- no such flow exists in token.go at all, a
materially larger separate piece of work than either task here.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Verified first: grant_types_supported advertises client_credentials in
discovery.go, but token.go only ever accepted authorization_code -- no
service-token issuance path exists at all. Building one from scratch is
materially bigger than extending the existing flow; explicitly not
attempted here, left open in the workplan rather than declared done.
What shipped for the human Authorization Code + PKCE flow:
- domain.User.Tenant (new, omitempty) + token.go's effectiveTenant():
falls back to tenant:coulomb (this workstation's actual tenant, ADR-0006)
when unset -- never an empty tenant claim, never a silent reassignment.
- principal_type: "human", unconditional.
- groups/roles promoted from scope-gated to unconditional core claims,
always [] not null when empty. One pre-existing test asserted the old
scope-gated groups behavior -- updated to match the new intentional
behavior, not left failing or reverted.
- assurance built from PKCESession.MFAVerified (new field, threaded
through completeAuthorization's two call sites in authorize.go) --
whether MFA was actually verified in this session, not static enrollment
state. aal2 only when required-and-passed this time, aal1 otherwise.
go build/vet clean, go test ./... green repo-wide. Two new authorize_test.go
cases assert MFAVerified on both paths. tests/profile/profile_test.go's
TestCompleteTokenFlow (the repo's own full HTTP integration test) extended
with real value assertions for all five claims, not just presence checks.
Python conformance tool not run against a live instance (needs the full
Authelia+LLDAP+privacyIDEA stack); TestCompleteTokenFlow's real HTTP round
trip covers the equivalent claim checks instead.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Discovered while planning tenant-engine's flex-auth WriteAuthorizer
(TEN-WP-0003): src/internal/server/oidc/token.go emits none of
iam-profile_v0.3.md's Core Claims yet -- not tenant, principal_type,
groups, roles, or assurance. tenant_roles isn't a small addition on top of
existing tenant support; it's the last, optional claim on top of a
baseline that doesn't exist yet.
Registered, not implemented -- security-sensitive Go token-issuance code
deserves dedicated context before changing, not a rushed edit from a first
read of the file.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Bernd's decision: role words (customer/vendor) collide with the separate
capability-role dimension a tenant can hold (PLTF/IAM/VEN/CUS, per
net-kingdom/docs/princedom-isolation-exploration.md's unratified model --
Binky itself is both CUS and, later, VEN). Tenants are grouped instead by
onboarding-risk/entity-shape, orthogonal to role: trial, friendly, single,
small, medium, large, enterprise, consumer, family, community, association,
agentic.
Binky maps to friendly -> tenant:friendly:binky, replacing the earlier
tenant:customer:binky throughout this workplan.
Two open questions flagged, not resolved here: where tenant:coulomb (the
platform's own internal/reference tenant) fits this external-shaped grouping
list, and whether net-kingdom should ratify this list into
iam-profile_v0.2.md's Tenant Claim section, since it currently still
documents the old customer/sandbox suggested identifiers and NetKingdom
owns that canon per ADR-0011.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Provisions the first real NetKingdom tenant (tenant:customer:binky, matching
the slug already live in production OpenBao paths) with a human tenant-admin
user and a workload-identity OIDC client for qonto-assistant's MCP callers,
routed through secrets-engine for secret custody and ops-warden for
discoverable, minimal-touch credential access. Closes Gap #1 flagged in
qonto-assistant's QONTO-WP-0003 closure (no OIDC issuer existed in the fleet).
Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
- Align agent files with on-disk workplan prefixes (infer from workplan ids)
- Set workplan domain to registered domain_slug; add topic_slug where applicable
- Repair frontmatter delimiter formatting; migrate legacy task status literals
- Regenerate AGENTS.md, CLAUDE.md, and .claude/rules from State Hub templates
- Makefile: add IMAGE_REGISTRY/IMAGE_REPO/IMAGE_TAG vars + image, push, image-tag targets
- .gitea/workflows/image.yaml: build+push on main push and v* tags via metadata-action
- README: Container Image section with pull/build/push/CI secret docs
Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
