|
Some checks failed
ci / check (push) Failing after 3s
These workplans do not reach the State Hub. The scanner selects files by 'type: workplan', so files declaring something else are skipped silently — not flagged as a gap, an error, or a warning, simply unseen. Records what the hub expects and how registration works, so the cleanup can be done deliberately when this repository is next picked up. No workplan file has been rewritten. Refs CUST-WP-0068-T04 Assistant: claude-code Assistant-Model: opus Assistant-Process: 2583210@bnt-lap001 Assistant-Session: f2bff2d5-e9b2-4338-92ca-10282a927006 |
||
|---|---|---|
| .. | ||
| CB-WP-0001-inner-loop.md | ||
| CB-WP-0002-cost-accounting.md | ||
| CB-WP-0003-loop-hardening.md | ||
| CB-WP-0004-mechanical-work.md | ||
| CB-WP-0005-assertion-coverage.md | ||
| CB-WP-0006-instrument-the-table.md | ||
| CB-WP-0007-session-shape.md | ||
| CB-WP-0008-ship-stage-0.md | ||
| CB-WP-0009-adaptive-gates.md | ||
| CB-WP-0010-consolidation.md | ||
| CB-WP-0011-inspectable-table.md | ||
| CB-WP-0012-render-port.md | ||
| CB-WP-0013-instrument-corrections.md | ||
| CB-WP-0014-execute-the-javascript.md | ||
| CB-WP-0015-the-inert-clauses.md | ||
| CB-WP-0016-the-drop-target.md | ||
| CB-WP-0017-legible-interaction.md | ||
| CB-WP-0018-the-browser-is-a-client.md | ||
| CB-WP-0019-the-am4-family.md | ||
| CB-WP-0020-the-table-you-can-read.md | ||
| CB-WP-0021-import-the-edition.md | ||
| CB-WP-0022-the-design-instrument.md | ||
| CB-WP-0023-solve-legality.md | ||
| CB-WP-0024-the-table-you-can-watch.md | ||
| CB-WP-0025-could-we-have-won.md | ||
| CB-WP-0026-collect-the-rulings.md | ||
| CB-WP-0027-the-commentary-track.md | ||
| CB-WP-0028-the-table-you-sit-at.md | ||
| CB-WP-0029-the-tokens-on-the-table.md | ||
| CB-WP-0030-a-number-that-does-not-move.md | ||
| CB-WP-0031-the-comment-box-outlives-the-game.md | ||
| CB-WP-0032-the-comments-in-the-account.md | ||
| CB-WP-0033-a-game-is-the-unit.md | ||
| CB-WP-0034-who-you-are-bonding-with.md | ||
| CB-WP-0035-a-session-that-answers-nothing.md | ||
| CB-WP-0036-interactive-mode.md | ||
| CB-WP-0037-the-fourteen-unread-files.md | ||
| CB-WP-0038-h1-variant.md | ||
| CB-WP-0039-a-seat-that-does-not-regulate.md | ||
| CB-WP-0040-what-a-statement-is-about.md | ||
| CB-WP-0041-the-extensive-form-foundation.md | ||
| CB-WP-0042-h2-scoped-problem-stress.md | ||
| CB-WP-0043-a-problem-sits-where-its-stress-lands.md | ||
| CB-WP-0044-the-page-says-which-rules-it-plays.md | ||
| CB-WP-0045-the-table-names-what-it-shows.md | ||
| CB-WP-0046-the-rule-the-placement-encodes.md | ||
| CB-WP-0047-all-four-boards-and-all-three-modes.md | ||
| CB-WP-0048-a-configuration-not-a-variant.md | ||
| CB-WP-0049-a-seat-that-plays-its-own-objective.md | ||
| CB-WP-0050-every-configuration-faceted-by-aspect.md | ||
| README.md | ||
Workplan structure and registration
Read this before adding or editing workplans in this repository.
Workplans here do not currently register with the State Hub. This note records why, and what has to change. Nothing has been rewritten — the files are left as they are so the cleanup can happen when this repository is next picked up.
What the hub expects
A workplan is a Markdown file in workplans/ whose frontmatter declares:
---
id: PREFIX-WP-NNNN # canonical record id; one prefix per repository
type: workplan # REQUIRED — this is what identifies the file
title: "..."
domain: <sector domain> # see the Repo Classification Standard
repo: <repo slug>
status: proposed | ready | active | blocked | backlog | finished | archived
owner: <who>
created: "YYYY-MM-DD"
updated: "YYYY-MM-DD"
---
Tasks are fenced blocks inside the file:
```task
id: PREFIX-WP-NNNN-T01
status: wait | todo | progress | done | cancel
priority: high | medium | low
```
Note the two vocabularies differ. done and todo are task statuses.
A workplan is finished, never done.
Why these files are invisible today
The scanner selects files by type: workplan. Anything else in frontmatter —
kind:, or no type at all — is skipped silently, so the file is not merely
unregistered but unseen: it does not appear as a gap, an error, or a warning.
Where a workplan also carries a status outside the list above, that status cannot be projected even once the file is found.
How registration works
Files originate the work; the hub holds a projection of them (ADR-001,
ADR-012). Never create records in the hub by hand — write the file, commit,
and let the registrar derive the record:
uv run --project ~/repo-manager rmgr registrar-reconcile \
--path . --confirm-primary --push
The registrar requires a clean worktree, and it will refuse a workplan whose backing file is not committed and pushed — a hub record whose source is only local cannot be re-derived by anyone else.
When cleaning this repository up
- Decide whether each file is genuinely a workplan. Some may be design notes or
product documents that simply live in
workplans/; those belong elsewhere, or should keep a non-workplan type deliberately. - For real workplans: set
type: workplan, map statuses to the workplan vocabulary, add the missing fields. - Commit, push, then run the registrar above.
References: the-custodian/.claude/rules/workplan-convention.md,
canon/architecture/adr-001-workplans-as-repo-artefacts.md,
canon/architecture/adr-012-projection-source-and-preliminary-overlay.md.